LLM-Based Human-machine Teaming for Air Traffic Controllers
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nowadays, the air traffic control (ATC) system is much more complex, and the number of situations in which controllers have to make decisions that can be assisted by intelligent decision-support systems (IDSSs) has grown. Current ATC systems are mainly based on human skills and rule-driven automation, which may have challenges in coping with dynamic operations, unstructured communication, and the growing airspace density. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought new opportunities for human–machine teaming, such as contextual reasoning, natural language understanding, and decision-support capabilities that adjust to the context. This paper explores the feasibility of human–machine teaming in air traffic control employing LLM. The study used a qualitative conceptual research approach using literature review and thematic analysis. Existing studies on human–machine teaming, aviation systems utilizing AI, explainable AI, and the field of air traffic management have been reviewed to explore the opportunities, challenges, and safety implications of implementing LLM in an ATC scenario. The results indicate that LLMs can assist air traffic controllers in various aspects, including communication management, procedural guidance, workload reduction, and situational awareness enhancement. The research also identified important problems of explainability, automation bias, reliability, risk of hallucination, cyber security and regulatory compliance. The study recommended a conceptual human-in-the-loop framework for LLM-assisted ATC operations that focuses on enhancing controller authority, introducing explainable AI mechanisms, ensuring system transparency, and designing systems for safety. The study contributes to the ongoing conversation regarding the impact of AI systems on aviation systems and provides a conceptual framework for integrating LLM with collaborative ATC decision-support systems. The results also indicate that human oversight, safety and reliability in system operation are critical considerations for future LLM-driven ATC systems, necessitating careful and transparent integration of AI capabilities to ensure reliable and safe ATC.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Endsley, M. R. (2017). From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human–automation research. Human Factors, 59(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816681350
Federal Aviation Administration. (2023). Air traffic control operations manual. Federal Aviation Administration
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2022). Artificial intelligence in aviation: Exploring opportunities and challenges. International Civil Aviation Organization
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
Kopardekar, P., Rios, J., Prevot, T., Johnson, M., Jung, J., & Robinson, J. (2016). Unmanned aircraft system traffic management (UTM) concept of operations. In AIAA Aviation Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3292
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
Lyons, J. B., Hoffman, R. R., Clancey, W. J., & Woods, D. D. (2021). Human–autonomy teaming: Definitions, debates, and directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 589585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589585
OpenAI. (2024). GPT-4 technical report. OpenAI
OpenAI. (2024). Hello GPT-4o. OpenAI GPT-4o
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.
Google DeepMind. (2024). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. Google Gemini
European Union Aviation Safety Agency. (2023). Artificial intelligence roadmap 2.0. European Union Aviation Safety Agency
Barry, K. (2025). Human factors requirements for human-AI teaming in aviation. Future Transportation, 5(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5020042
Bienefeld, N., & Grote, G. (2024). Human-AI teaming in critical care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e50130. https://doi.org/10.2196/50130
Caldwell, S., & Sallis, P. (2022). An agile new research framework for hybrid human-AI teaming. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514257
Korentsides, J. (2025). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the flight deck. Journal of Air Transport Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102620
Kirwan, B. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on future aviation safety culture. Future Transportation, 4(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp4020018
Xu, W. (2024). Applying HCAI in developing effective human-AI teaming: A perspective from human-AI joint cognitive systems. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3635116
Damacharla, P., Javaid, A. Y., Gallimore, J. J., & Devabhaktuni, V. (2020). Common metrics to benchmark human-machine teams: A review. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2008.04855. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.04855
Chen, D., Li, H., Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2025). Advancing human-machine teaming: Concepts, challenges, and applications. ACM Computing Surveys. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16518
Chakraborti, T., Kambhampati, S., Scheutz, M., & Zhang, Y. (2017). AI challenges in human-robot cognitive teaming. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1707.04775. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04775